Resolving
Financial Disputes
Money is the root of all
evil, or so they say. Certainly, it’s one of the biggest
causes of animosity in divorce. Peter Watson-Lee outlines
the legal process that may help you sort things out.
Peter Watson-Lee is a past Chairman of the Law Society
of England & Wales’ Family Law Committee, and
a practising solicitor with Messrs Williams Thompson, a
specialist family law practice in Christchurch, Dorset.
There is just no way that we are
going to be able to sort out the finances. I don’t
even know what he’s got, we can’t talk and,
frankly, I don’t trust him. What can I do?
But I cannot bear the thought of
having to be involved in a court case. The whole idea terrifies
me!
Just because you ask the court to look at the finances,
it does not mean you are going to end up in a fully disputed
court case. Making an application to court on the finances
should not be regarded as a hostile step or a last resort,
rather, it is a way of starting the court timetable. Under
the new procedure, the court’s aim is to encourage
parties to agree matters and avoid disputed court hearings
wherever possible.
What’s this about a ‘new
procedure’?
Since June 2000, the courts have been running a new
procedure for sorting out the finances on divorce. It
is intended to enable the courts to deal with cases justly,
while ensuring that they are dealt with speedily via a
court timetable.
That sounds like a good idea.
So what do I do if I want to get the courts to look at our
finances?
Once a divorce petition is issued, either a husband
or a wife can start the procedure by sending a form to
the court, together with an £210 court fee. The
form (known as a Form A) has to outline in broad details
what financial applications you want to make. These are
generally going to be one or more of maintenance payments
(sometimes called periodical payments), a lump sum, or
an order relating to a property – such as the sale
or transfer of the matrimonial home. You can also ask
the court to look at sharing out any pension fund.
So what happens then?
Once the court receives the Form A, it sets a timetable.
First, both you and your spouse will need to fill in a
statement giving full details of all your finances (known
as Form E). Once completed, a copy is sent to your spouse
and another copy to the court. The court will tell you
when this needs to be done, but you will have about seven
weeks to do this.
And how much detail do I have
to give?
Quite a lot – Form E is over 20 pages long! You
have to give some background details about dates of the
marriage and the children, details of any property that
is owned with values and the amount of any mortgages outstanding,
and details of all your bank accounts together with bank
statements for the last 12 months. You need to give details
of all your other investments, details of any debts, pensions
and other policies you may have. You also need to give
details of your income and include recent payslips if
you are employed or your trading accounts if you are self-employed.
You then need to give details of what you say you need
by way of income and capital and there is space for other
comments as well.
It sounds as if you need to
give a lot of information!
Yes, it is not the easiest form to fill in. You will
probably need to spend some weeks information gathering.
For example, you might need to write off to your pension
company for the necessary details. However, the idea is
that if you both do it properly, you will have full information
about each other’s finances, which will save a lot
of misunderstandings later.
So does my other half have
to give all these details?
Yes. There is no way that you can properly settle the
finances unless the other party has given full details
of their finances. If you are not happy with the answers
given, you are entitled to raise a questionnaire asking
for further details. The court has the power to order
your spouse to answer those questions, if it thinks they
are relevant.
So what next?
When the court sets the timetable, it will also give
a first hearing date. This is not a full court hearing
but an occasion when both of you and your solicitors go
along to court to see a district judge who will have an
initial look at the case. He can then either give directions
as to what further information needs to be produced or
actually give an overview as to what he thinks the outcome
of the case might be.
Do I have to go to this court
hearing? Even the thought of it makes me nervous!
Yes, you will need to attend – unless you are
able to agree a financial settlement before the hearing.
That is not as unusual as you may think. Quite often,
the exchange of the financial details and the involvement
of solicitors in filling in the forms may have helped
you agree terms.
But if we have not been able
to agree something, do I still have to go to court?
Yes, but the hearings are in private rooms where only
the judge, your solicitors and yourselves can attend.
Furthermore, the solicitors will do all the talking and
it is very unlikely that you will have to say anything.
The court just needs you there so that you can see what
is going on and you are available in case you are able
to discuss matters. Again, quite often the fact that you
are all at court together results in matters being agreed.
So do we have to do anything
else to prepare for this first hearing?
Two weeks before the hearing your solicitor will need
to file some statements at court. The first is the questionnaire
listing any further questions you want to ask your spouse.
The second is a concise statement of what the issues between
you are (e.g. are you arguing over what should happen
to the house or just the levels of maintenance payments
that should be made?) Finally, the solicitor has to file
a chronology giving the main dates, so that the judge
can understand the history of your marriage. The solicitor
also needs to prepare a schedule of his or her fees so
far, so that all parties can understand the sort of costs
that are being incurred.
And what happens at this first
hearing?
There are two possibilities. It can be a relatively
short ‘Directions Hearing’ when the judge
makes orders about the further information that needs
to be provided by one or both parties. If that is the
case, the judge will then fix the ‘Financial Dispute
Resolution Appointment’. Alternatively, if both
parties agree, the judge can deal with this first hearing
as the Financial Dispute Resolution Appointment to save
having a second hearing.
And what on earth is a ‘Financial
Dispute Resolution Appointment’?
Good question. This is one of the main features of the
new system. The appointment is a meeting with the judge
held for the purposes of discussion and negotiation. You
have to attend with your solicitor and there is strong
encouragement by the judge for you both to put forward
proposals to see whether a negotiated settlement can be
reached. You go before a district judge who will have
no further involvement in the case. The judge will have
read the papers and will listen to an outline of the facts
from the solicitors. The judge will then give some indications
as to how he thinks the court might deal with the matter.
This can be helpful if, for example, your spouse is not
taking a realistic view of the case. In particular, the
judge will want to know what offers have been made to
settle the case so far and whether there are any aspects
that can be agreed.
So if we can agree matters at this
stage, what happens then?
If you both agree, the judge can actually make a court
order there and then to settle matters and conclude the
case.
And if we can’t agree?
If you are still unable to agree a settlement, the judge
will fix a full hearing. This will often be a month or
two later and you will probably be given a full day –
maybe more if your case is complex. You will need to attend
that hearing and may well be asked to give evidence and
be asked questions by your spouse’s solicitor or
barrister. Likewise, your solicitor or barrister will
be able to cross-examine your spouse. A different judge
will hear the case and at the end of the hearing, he or
she will make a decision as to what the financial settlement
should be. That decision will be a binding court order
that you will both have to accept. Judges have a wide
discretion in matrimonial cases and he or she will not
be bound by any indications given by the earlier judge
– in fact they will not even be aware of what that
earlier judge may have said at the Financial Dispute Resolution
Appointment.
So if we cannot settle the
case at the Financial Dispute Resolution Appointment, there
is no alternative but a full court hearing?
Not necessarily. The courts are always encouraging parties
to negotiate and settle matters. Even if you have not
settled the matter at the Financial Dispute Resolution,
sometimes that will have at least narrowed the issues
and you might find a settlement can take place by agreement
before the full hearing takes place. A full court hearing
needs a lot of preparation and this increases the costs
– so you do need to think carefully about trying
to settle matters by agreement even at this stage.
What happens if we can actually
settle our case?
No settlement is final and binding until a court order
has been made. So if a settlement takes place, your solicitors
will draw up the terms of settlement, recording, for example,
what has been agreed about the house and what any maintenance
payments should be. This is then either given to the judge
if it is at a hearing or sent in by post for a judge to
approve. Once the judge has read the order and approved
it, the court will stamp it as a court order and you then
have a binding settlement which you both have to comply
with.
And who has to pay the costs
of all these hearings?
The only court fee to be paid is the initial £210.
However, it is certainly wise to have a solicitor to help
you and represent you. His or her costs will usually depend
on the time involved – and will therefore increase
as the matter proceeds. This is another reason for settling
earlier rather than later. You will be responsible for
your own solicitor’s costs.
However, courts do have power to order your spouse to
pay towards your costs, or indeed order you to pay his
or her costs. In particular, the court expects both parties
to make realistic offers of settlement as the case proceeds.
If one of you does not, there is a real chance that the
court might order that person to pay towards the other’s
costs. The rules of how this works are complex and your
solicitor will be able to explain them. However, the rules
are there to encourage all parties to be realistic from
the start and to make a genuine attempt to settle matters
by negotiation.
back to index |